4.7 Review

A review of the quality and content of mobile apps to support lifestyle modifications following a transient ischaemic attack or 'minor' stroke

Journal

DIGITAL HEALTH
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/20552076211065271

Keywords

Mobile apps; mHealth; systematic review; transient ischaemic attack; 'minor' stroke; secondary prevention

Funding

  1. Northern Ireland Chest, Heart Stroke (NICHS)
  2. National Institute of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the quality of apps for supporting lifestyle change following a TIA or 'minor' stroke, finding that only a small number of apps met the criteria and that overall quality was low. Further development and testing of accessible, user-designed, and evidence-informed digital interventions are needed for this population.
Objective Secondary prevention is recommended to reduce cardiovascular risk after transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or 'minor' stroke. Mobile health interventions can provide accessible, cost-effective approaches to address modifiable risk factors, such as physical inactivity, hypertension and being overweight. The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of apps for supporting lifestyle change following a TIA or 'minor' stroke. Methods Systematic searches of Google Play and the Apple Store were carried out to identify mobile apps released between 1 November 2019 and 1 October 2021. Keywords were used including stroke, TIA, lifestyle, prevention and recovery. Quality was assessed using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). Common components were identified with the Behaviour Change Technique (BCT) Taxonomy. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the performance results for each app. Results Searches identified 2545 potential apps. Thirty remained after removing duplicates and screening titles and descriptions. Six were eligible after full review of their content. All apps included at least one BCT (range: 1-16 BCTs). The most frequent BCTs included 'information about health consequences' (n = 5/6), 'verbal or visual communication from a credible source' (n = 4/6) and 'action planning' (n = 4/6). The mean MARS score was 2.57/5 (SD: 0.51; range: 1.78-3.36). No apps were of 'good' overall quality (scoring more than 4/5). Conclusions This is the first review of mobile health interventions for this population. Only a small number of apps were available. None were targeted specifically at people with a TIA or 'minor' stroke. Overall quality was low. Further work is needed to develop and test accessible, user designed, and evidence-informed digital interventions in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available