4.8 Article

Comparing Ion Exchange Adsorbents for Nitrogen Recovery from Source-Separated Urine

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages 2373-2381

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05816

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) through the ReNUWIt Engineering Research Center [CBET-0853512]
  2. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE 1106400]
  3. Ford Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Separate collection of urine, which is only 1% of wastewater volume but contains the majority of nitrogen humans excrete, can potentially reduce the costs and energy input of wastewater treatment and facilitate recovery of nitrogen for beneficial use. Ion exchange was investigated for recovery of nitrogen as ammonium from urine for use as a fertilizer or disinfectant. Cation adsorption curves for four adsorbents (clinoptilolite, biochar, Dowex 50, and Dowex Mac 3) were compared in pure salt solutions, synthetic urine, and real stored urine. Competition from sodium and potassium present in synthetic and real urine did not significantly decrease ammonium adsorption for any of the adsorbents. Dowex 50 and Dowex Mac 3 showed nearly 100% regeneration efficiencies. Estimated ion exchange reactor volumes to capture the nitrogen for 1 week from a four-person household were lowest for Dowex Mac 3 (5 L) and highest for biochar (19 L). Although Dowex Mac 3 had the highest adsorption capacity, material costs ($/g N removed) were lower for clinoptilolite and biochar because of their substantially lower unit cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available