4.8 Article

Application of Struvite Alters the Antibiotic Resistome in Soil, Rhizosphere, and Phyllosphere

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 14, Pages 8149-8157

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01420

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB15020402, XDB15020302]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21210008, 41571130063]
  3. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2011DFB91710]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Struvite recovered from wastewater is a renewable source of phosphorus and nitrogen and can be used as fertilizer for plant growth. However, antibiotics and resistome can be enriched in the struvite derived from wastewater. Robust understanding of the potential risks after struvite application to soils has remained elusive. Here, we profiled antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) in struvite, soil, rhizosphere and phyllosphere of Brassica using high-throughput quantitative PCR. A total of 165 ARGs and 10 MGEs were detected. Application of struvite was found to increase both the abundance and diversity of ARGs in soil, rhizosphere and phyllosphere. In addition, ARGs shared exclusively between Brassica phyllosphere and struvite were identified, indicating that struvite was an important source of ARGs found in phyllosphere. Furthermore, OTUs shared between rhizosphere and phyllosphere were found to significantly correlate with ARGs, suggesting that microbiota in leaf and root could interconnect and ARGs might transfer from struvite to the surface of plants via rhizosphere using bacteria as spreading medium. These findings demonstrated that struvite as an organic fertilizer can facilitate the spread of antibiotic resistance into human food chain and this environment-acquired antibiotic resistance should be put into human health risk assessment system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available