3.8 Article

The gender gap in highly prestigious international research awards, 2001-2020

Journal

QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 976-989

Publisher

MIT PRESS
DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00148

Keywords

awards; gender disparity; gender gap; prizes; women in engineering; women in science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

From 2001 to 2020, there were significant gender disparities in the world's 141 most prestigious international research awards, with women receiving a lower share of awards, particularly in biological, computer, and mathematical sciences. Further investigation is needed to understand the factors contributing to this gender gap.
This study examines gender disparities in the world's 141 most prestigious international research awards. I find that (a) from 2001 to 2020 these awards were received 3,445 times by 2,011 men and 262 women; (b) women's share increased from an annual average of 6% during 2001-2005 to an annual average of 19% during 2016-2020; (c) 49 of the 141 awards were not received by women during 2016-2020; and (d) when the numbers of female full professors are taken into consideration, the gender gap remains highly disproportionate in biological and life sciences, computer science, and mathematics. Overall, women would be expected to increase their share of awards by nearly 50% to achieve parity with men today. The study shows great similarities between men and women award recipients in journal articles per author, the average number of authors per article, the proportion of articles in top journals, citations per article, and participation in large research groups and international collaborations. I conclude that the gender gap in highly prestigious research awards is largely a result of demographic inertia and other factors that deserve further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available