3.8 Proceedings Paper

Peripheral Nerve Segmentation in Ultrasound Images Using Conditioned U-Net

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89691-1_13

Keywords

Nerve segmentation; U-Net; Deep learning; Ultrasound; Peripheral nerve blocking

Funding

  1. Doctorate Scholarship Convocatoria del Fondo de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion del Sistema General de Regalias para la conformacion de una lista de proyectos elegibles para ser viabilizados, priorizados y aprobados por el OCAD en el marco del Programa d
  2. [111084467950]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peripheral Nerve Blocking (PNB) is a regional anesthesia procedure commonly guided by ultrasound images. An automatic nerve segmentation system can assist specialists in performing successful nerve blocks. The proposed deep neural network, C-UNet, outperforms conventional methods in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.
Peripheral Nerve Blocking (PNB) is a regional anesthesia procedure that delivers an anesthetic in the proximity of a nerve to avoid nociceptive transmission. Anesthesiologists have widely used ultrasound images to guide the PNB due to their low cost, non-invasivity, and lack of radiation. Due to the difficulties in visually locating the target nerve, automatic nerve segmentation systems attempt to support the specialist to perform a successful nerve block. This work introduces a deep neural network for automatic nerve segmentation in ultrasound images. The proposed approach consists of a conditioned U-Net model that includes the kind of target nerve as a second input allowing the network to learn new features to improve the segmentation. The model is trained and tested on a dataset holding four different peripheral nerves, achieving an average Dice coefficient of 0.70. Results show that the proposed C-UNet outperforms the conventional U-Net, benefiting the ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available