4.8 Article

Expanded Target-Chemical Analysis Reveals Extensive Mixed Organic-Contaminant Exposure in US Streams

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 9, Pages 4792-4802

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00012

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. USGS Toxic Substances Hydrology Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface water from 38 streams nationwide was assessed using 14 target-organic methods (719 compounds). Designed-bioactive anthropogenic contaminants (biocides, pharmaceuticals) comprised 57% of 406 organics detected at least once. The 10 most-frequently detected anthropogenicorganics included eight pesticides (desulfinylfipronil, AMPA, chlorpyrifos, dieldrin, metolachlor, atrazine, CIAT, glyphosate) and two pharmaceuticals (caffeine, metformin) with detection frequencies ranging 66-84% of.all sites. Detected contaminant concentrations varied from less than 1 ng L-1 to greater than 10 mu g L-1, with 77 and 278 having median detected concentrations greater than 100 mu g L-1 and 10 mu g L-1, respectively. Cumulative detections and concentrations ranged 4-161 compounds (median 70) and 8.5-102 847 mu g L-1, respectively, and correlated significantly with wastewater discharge, watershed development, and toxic release inventory metrics. Log10 concentrations of widely monitored HHCB, triclosan, and carbamazepine explained 71-82% of the variability in the total number of compounds detected (linear regression; p-values: < 0.001-0.012), providing a statistical inference tool for unmonitored contaminants. Due to multiple modes of action, high bioactivity, biorecalcitrance, and direct environment application (pesticides), designed-bioactive organics (median 41 per site at fig L-1 cumulative concentrations) in developed watersheds present aquatic health concerns, given their acknowledged potential for sublethal effects to sensitive species and lifecycle stages at low ng L-1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available