4.8 Article

Impact of Mn(II)-Manganese Oxide Reactions on Ni and Zn Speciation

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 6, Pages 3187-3196

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04347

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), Division of Earth Sciences, Geobiology and Low-Temperature Geochemistry Program [EAR-1056480]
  2. NSF [ECS-0335765, EAR-1161543]
  3. U.S. DOE [DE-ACO2-06CH11357]
  4. DOE Office of Science [DE-ACO2-76SF00515]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Layered Mn oxide minerals (phyllomanganates) often control trace metal fate in natural systems. The strong uptake of metals such as Ni and Zn by phyllomanganates results from adsorption on or incorporation into vacancy sites. Mn(II) also binds to vacancies and subsequent comproportionation with structural Mn(IV) may alter sheet structures by forming larger and distorted Mn(III)O6 octahedra. Such Mn(II)-phyllomanganate reactions may thus alter metal uptake by blocking key reactive sites. Here we investigate the effect of Mn(II) on Ni and Zn binding to phyllomanganates of varying initial vacancy content (?-MnO2, hexagonal birnessite, and triclinic birnessite) at pH 4 and 7 under anaerobic conditions. Dissolved Mn(II) decreases macroscopic Ni and Zn uptake at pH 4 but not pH 7. Extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy demonstrates that decreased uptake at pH 4 corresponds with altered Ni and Zn adsorption mechanisms. These metals transition from binding in the interlayer to sheet edges, with Zn increasing its tetrahedrally coordinated fraction. These effects on metal uptake and binding correlate with Mn(II)-induced structural changes, which are more substantial at pH 4 than 7. Through these structural effects and the pH-dependence of Mn(II)-metal competitive adsorption, system pH largely controls metal binding to phyllomanganates in the presence of dissolved Mn(II).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available