4.8 Article

Methane, Black Carbon, and Ethane Emissions from Natural Gas Flares in the Bakken Shale, North Dakota

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 9, Pages 5317-5325

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05183

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NOAA AC4 program [NA140AR0110139]
  2. NASA [NNX14AI87G]
  3. NOAA Climate Program Office
  4. NOAA Atmospheric Chemistry, Carbon Cycle, and Climate Program
  5. NASA [NNX14AI87G, 681517] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Incomplete combustion during flaring can lead to production of black carbon (BC) and loss of methane and other pollutants to the atmosphere, impacting climate and air quality. However, few studies have measured flare efficiency in a real-world setting. We use airborne data of plume samples from 37 unique flares in the Bakken region of North Dakota in May 2014 to calculate emission factors for BC, methane, ethane, and combustion efficiency for methane and ethane. We find no clear relationship between emission factors and aircraft-level wind speed or between methane and BC emission factors. Observed median combustion efficiencies for methane and ethane are close to expected values for typical flares according to the US EPA (98%). However, we find that the efficiency distribution is skewed, exhibiting log-normal behavior. This suggests incomplete combustion from flares contributes almost 1/5 of the total field emissions of methane and ethane measured in the Bakken shale, more than double the expected value if 98% efficiency was representative. BC emission factors also have a skewed distribution, but we find lower emission values than previous studies. The direct observation for the first time of a heavy-tail emissions distribution from flares suggests the need to consider skewed distributions when assessing flare impacts globally.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available