4.8 Article

Mediated Electrochemical Reduction of Iron (Oxyhydr-)Oxides under Defined Thermodynamic Boundary Conditions

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 560-570

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04411

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_149283/1]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation Division of Earth Sciences [GEO-1451593]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_149283] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Iron (oxyhydr-)oxide reduction has been extensively studied because of its importance in pollutant redox dynamics and biogeochemical processes. Yet, experimental studies linking oxide reduction kinetics to thermodynamics remain scarce. Here, we used mediated electrochemical reduction (MER) to directly quantify the extents and rates of ferrihydrite, goethite, and hematite reduction over a range of negative reaction free energies, Delta(r)G, that were obtained by systematically varying pH (5.0 to 8.0), applied reduction potentials (-0.53 to -0.17 V vs SHE), and Fe2+ concentrations (up to 40 mu M). Ferrihydrite reduction was complete and fast at all tested Delta(r)G values, consistent with its comparatively low thermodynamic stability. Reduction of the thermodynamically more stable goethite and hematite changed from complete and fast to incomplete and slow as Delta(r)G values became less negative. Reductions at intermediate Delta(r)G values showed negative linear correlations between the natural logarithm of the reduction rate constants and Delta(r)G. These correlations imply that thermodynamics controlled goethite and hematite reduction rates. Beyond allowing to study iron oxide reduction under defined thermodynamic conditions, MER can also be used to capture changes in iron oxide reducibility during phase transformations, as shown for Fe2+-facilitated transformation of ferrihydrite to goethite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available