4.8 Article

Coupling Bioflocculation of Dehalococcoides mccartyi to High-Rate Reductive Dehalogenation of Chlorinated Ethenes

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 19, Pages 11297-11307

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03097

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER [1053939]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Engineering Education and Centers [1449501] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Continuous bioreactors operated at low hydraulic retention times have rarely been explored for reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated ethenes. The inability to consistently develop such bioreactors affects the way growth approaches for Dehalococcoides mccartyi bioaugmentation cultures are envisioned. It also affects interpretation of results from in situ continuous treatment processes. We report bioreactor performance and dehalogenation kinetics of a D. mccartyi-containing consortium in an upflow bioreactor. When fed synthetic groundwater at 11-3.6 h HRT, the upflow bioreactor removed >99.7% of the influent trichloroethene (1.5-2.8 mM) and produced ethene as the main product. A trichloroethene removal rate of 98.51 +/- 0.05 me(-) equiv L-1 d(-1) was achieved at 3.6 h HRT. D. mccartyi cell densities were 10(13) and 10(12) 16S rRNA gene copies L-1 in the bioflocs and planktonic culture, respectively. When challenged with a feed of natural groundwater containing various competing electron acceptors and 0.3-0.4 mM trichloroethene, trichloroethene removal was sustained at >99.6%. Electron micrographs revealed that D. mccartyi were abundant within the bioflocs, not only in multispecies structures, but also as self-aggregated micro colonies. This study provides fundamental evidence toward the feasibility of upflow bioreactors containing D. mccartyi as high-density culture production tools or as a high-rate, real-time remediation biotechnology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available