4.5 Review

A review on the food digestion in the digestive tract and the used in vitro models

Journal

CURRENT RESEARCH IN FOOD SCIENCE
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages 308-319

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2021.04.004

Keywords

In vitro, food digestion; Dynamic model; Food matrix

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is important to replicate or mimic the conditions of the human digestive system closely in model systems to obtain accurate food digestion-related data, which can contribute to studies on health and nutrition. The review discusses the role of the human digestive system in food digestion, compares the capability of models used in simulations, especially dynamic in vitro models, and describes the disintegration mechanism of the food matrix in the digestive system. Discussions on advancements, limitations, and prospects of these models were also included.
Y It is crucial to replicate or mimic the human digestive system conditions closely in model systems to have the food digestion-related data as accurate as possible. Thus, the data obtained could contribute to studies like those on the relationship between health and nutrition. This review aims to express the human digestion system's role in food digestion and compare the capability of the models used in simulations, especially the dynamic in vitro models. Activities of the human digestive system governing food digestion and the food matrix's disintegration mechanism in the digestive system were discussed. Dynamic in vitro models and their relevance to the human digestive system were described. Advancements in the last 20 years, as well as limitations of those artificial systems, with prospects, were discussed. Extensive use and improvement on these models will extend our knowledge of the food matrix and digestive system's complex interaction. Thus, it will be possible to design next-generation foods with improved health benefits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available