4.8 Article

Occupational Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon of Wildland Firefighters at Prescribed and Wildland Fires

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 11, Pages 6461-6469

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00950

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Targeted Research Traineeship [T42 OH008429]
  2. Northern California Center for Occupational and Environmental Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wildland firefighters suppressing wildland fires or conducting prescribed fires work long. shifts during which they are exposed to high-levels of wood smoke with. no respiratory protection. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are hazardous air pollutants fop-lied during incomplete combustion. Exposure to PAHs was measured-for 21 wildland firefighters suppressing two, wildland fires and wildland firefighters-conducting prescribed burns in California, Personal air samples were actively collected using XAD4-coated quartz fiber filters-and XAD2 sorbent tubes. Samples were, analyzed for 17 individual PAHs through extraction with dichloromethane and gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer-analysis. Naphthalene, retene, and phenanthrene were consistently the highest measured PAHs. PAH concentrations were higher at wildland fires compared,to prescribed fires and were highest for firefighters during job tasks that involve the most direct contact with smoke, near an actively burning wildland fire. Although concentrations did not exceed current occupational exposure limits, wildland firefighters are exposed to PAHs not only on the fire line at wildland fires, but also while working prescribed burns and while off-duty. Characterization of occupational exposures from wildland firefighting is important to Understand better any potential long-term health effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available