3.9 Article

A low-cost, wearable, do-it-yourself functional near-infrared spectroscopy (DIY-fNIRS) headband

Journal

HARDWAREX
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ohx.2021.e00204

Keywords

Functional near infrared spectroscopy; Neuroimaging; Hemodynamics; Brain imaging

Funding

  1. Dorothy J. Wingfield Phillips Chancellor Faculty Fellowship
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1 R21 MH123873-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advancements in technology have increased interest in using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for neuromonitoring in naturalistic environments. This article introduces an open source, fully integrated wireless fNIRS headband system with a user-friendly and comfortable design for easy data collection in research.
Neuromonitoring in naturalistic environments is of increasing interest for a variety of research fields including psychology, economics, and productivity. Among functional neuromonitoring modalities, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is well regarded for its potential for miniaturization, good spatial and temporal resolutions, and resilience to motion artifacts. Historically, the large size and high cost of fNIRS systems have precluded widespread adoption of the technology. In this article, we describe the first open source, fully integrated wireless fNIRS headband system with a single LED-pair source and four detectors. With ease of operation and comfort in mind, the system is encased in a soft, lightweight cloth and silicone enclosure. Accompanying computer and smartphone data collection software have also been provided, and the hardware has been validated using classic fNIRS tasks. This wear-and-go design can easily be scaled to accommodate a larger number of fNIRS channels and opens the door to easily collecting fNIRS data during routine activities in naturalistic conditions. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available