4.7 Article

Anthropogenic mercury emissions from 1980 to 2012 in China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 226, Issue -, Pages 230-239

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.03.059

Keywords

Anthropogenic sources; Impact; Mercury emissions; Pathways; Regional variation

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Bureau of Zhejiang Province [2015C02011, 2015C03020]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFD800805, 2016YFD800802]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the central Universities of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

China was considered the biggest contributor for airborne mercury in the world but the amount of mercury emission in effluents and solid wastes has not been documented. In this study, total national and regional mercury emission to the environment via exhaust gases, effluents and solid wastes were accounted with updated emission factors and the amount of goods produced and/or consumed. The national mercury emission in China increased from 448 to 2151 tons during the 1980-2012 period. Nearly all of the emissions were ended up as exhaust gases and solid wastes. The proportion of exhaust gases decreased with increasing share of solid wastes and effluents. Of all the anthropogenic sources, coal was the most important contributor in quantity, followed by mercury mining, gold smelting, nonferrous smelting, iron steel production, domestic wastes, and cement production, with accounting for more than 90% of the total emission. There was a big variation of regional cumulative mercury emission during 1980 -2012 in China, with higher emissions occurred in eastern areas and lower values in the western and far northern regions. The biggest cumulative emission occurred in GZ (Guizhou), reaching 3974 t, while the smallest cumulative emission was lower than 10 t in XZ (Tibet). Correspondingly, mercury accumulation in soil were higher in regions with larger emissions in unit area. Therefore, it is urgent to reduce anthropogenic mercury emission and subsequent impact on ecological functions and human health. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available