4.7 Article

Spatial distribution and source identification of heavy metals in surface soils in a typical coal mine city, Lianyuan, China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 225, Issue -, Pages 681-690

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.03.057

Keywords

Heavy metals; Soil; Spatial distribution; Source apportionment; Positive matrix factorization (PMF)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51479072, 51679082, 51521006, 51579094, 51579098]
  2. Ministry of Education of China [NCET-08-0181]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigated the pollution degree and spatial distribution of heavy metals and determined their sources in topsoil in a typical coal mine city, Lianyuan, Hunan Province, China. We collected 6078 soil surface samples in different land use types. And the concentrations of Zn, Cd, Cu, Hg, Pb, Sb, As, Mo, V, Mn, Fe and Cr were measured. The average contents of all heavy metals were lower than their corresponding Grade II values of Chinese Soil Quality Standard with the exception of Hg. However, average contents of twelve heavy metals, except for Mn, exceeded their background level in soils in Hunan Province. Based on one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), the contents of Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, Hg, Mo and V were related to the anthropogenic source and there were statistically significant differences in their concentrations among different land use patterns. The spatial variation of heavy metal was visualized by GIS. The PMF model was used to ascertain contamination sources of twelve heavy metals and apportion their source contributions in Lianyuan soils. The results showed that the source contributions of the natural source, atmospheric deposition, industrial activities and agricultural activities accounted for 33.6%, 26.05%, 23.44% and 16.91%, respectively. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available