4.7 Article

Endophytic Bacteria in Banana In Vitro Cultures: Molecular Identification, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Plant Survival

Journal

HORTICULTURAE
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae7120526

Keywords

16S rDNA; chlorosis; micropropagation; microbial contamination; tissue browning

Categories

Funding

  1. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [RSP-2021/375]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified and controlled bacterial contaminants in banana in vitro cultures, showing that certain antibiotics had a broader range of bactericidal activity. Treatment with antibiotics could eliminate bacteria in contaminated banana cultures, but also led to a reduction in shoot multiplication and growth. These findings contribute to minimizing losses in commercial banana micropropagation.
Microbial contamination is a common problem that causes significant losses in plant micropropagation systems. The present study reports on the identification and control of bacterial contaminants in banana in vitro cultures. Twelve isolates belonging to Bacillus pumilus (S2), Bacillus subtilis (R2 and M4), Geobacillus stearothermophilus (S1, S3, S4, P2, M3 and R3) and Paenibacillus spp. (P1, R1 and M2) were identified by sequencing of 16S rRNA, gyrA or gyrB genes. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed with the disk diffusion method on bacterial isolates using 36 antimicrobial agents. Some antibiotics, notably Ticarcillin, Penicillin, Ampicillin, Cefazolin and Imipenem, had a broader range of bactericidal activity than others did. When contaminated axillary shoot cultures of banana were treated with 100 or 200 mg center dot L-1 of ticarcillin, ampicillin or penicillin the bacteria were eliminated, but a reduction in shoot multiplication and growth was observed. These findings contribute to minimizing the losses in the commercial micropropagation of banana.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available