4.4 Article

The P wave dispersion-one pixel, one millisecond

Journal

REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 1633-1640

Publisher

IMR PRESS
DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2204170

Keywords

P wave duration; P wave dispersion; Total atrial activation time

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated that P-wave dispersion is an artifact of low accuracy in P wave measurement, with high precision measurement methods yielding different results compared to imprecise methods.
The electrophysiological activity of the heart is recorded and presented in form of electrocardiogram (ECG). In 1998 the concept of P wave dispersion as the risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence was introduced. It was calculated as the difference between the longest and the shortest P wave. The aim of our study is to prove that the P wave dispersion is an artifact of low accuracy in P wave measurement. The study included 186 patients (78M108F) aged 59.7 +/- 12.9 years, undergoing various electrophysiological procedures. The P wave was measured twice: first, at the paper speed of so m m/s, enhancement 8x (standard- imprecise) and the second time at zoo mm/s, 64-256x (precise). The imprecise measurement method resulted in different duration of all P wave parameters in comparison with precise measurement. The difference between Delta P max and Delta P min indicated a higher value for the latter parameter. It was indicated that the imprecise P wave dispersion value correlated most significantly with the maximal P wave duration, which was measured in a similar way. In contrast with the imprecise measurement method, the minimal and maximal durations of the P waves, being measured accurately, were almost identical. Using precise methodology, the P wave dispersion reaches negligible values and tends to zero. The measurements of the P wave have to be precise to assure the highest scientific and medical sincerity. The highest clinical value is related to the P wave duration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available