4.7 Article

Multigenerational effects of gold nanoparticles in Caenorhabditis elegans: Continuous versus intermittent exposures

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 220, Issue -, Pages 46-52

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.021

Keywords

Exposure pattern; Multi-generation; Gold colloid; Nano-toxicity; Caenorhabditis elegans

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning [2014R1A2A1A11050513, 2016R1A2B3010445]
  3. Ministry of Education [2013R1A1A2061386]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanomaterials can become disseminated directly or indirectly into the soil ecosystem through various exposure routes. Thus, it is important to study various deposition routes of nanomaterials into the soil, as well as their toxicities. Here, we investigated the multigenerational effects of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) on C elegans after continuous or intermittent food intake. Following continuous exposure, significant differences were observed in the reproduction rate of C. elegans in the F2-F4 generations, which were associated with reproductive system abnormalities. However, following intermittent AuNP exposure in PO and F3, reproductive system abnormalities and inhibited reproduction rates were observed in F2 and F3. While continuous AuNP exposure impaired reproduction from F2 to F4, intermittent exposure caused more pronounced effects on F3 worms, which may have resulted from damage during the convalescence period up through F2. These data showed the occurrence of multigenerational effects following different exposure patterns, exposure levels, and recovery periods. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that multigenerational nano-toxicity is caused by different exposure patterns and provides insights into the unpredictable exposure scenarios of AuNPs and their adverse effects. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available