4.0 Article

3D Printing of Biomass-Fungi Composite Material: Effects of Mixture Composition on Print Quality

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmmp5040112

Keywords

biomass-fungi composite; mycelium; 3D printing; material extrusion; rheology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explored the relationship between psyllium husk powder content and print quality when using biomass-fungi composite materials for 3D printing. The results showed that an increase in psyllium husk powder to water ratio improved print quality up to a certain point, beyond which extrudability deteriorated. This phenomenon was explained by analyzing the rheological properties of the mixtures.
It is known that 3D printing can facilitate greater design flexibility in the printing of custom shapes for packaging and construction applications using biomass-fungi composite materials. The feasibility of this new method was demonstrated by a preliminary experiment, the results of which were reported in a journal publication in 2020. As a follow-up, this paper reports on an experimental study on the relationship between the mixture composition (i.e., the psyllium husk powder content) and print quality using this new method. Four mixtures were prepared by varying the amounts of psyllium husk powder (in grams) added to 400 mL of water. The ratios (g/mL) of psyllium husk powder weight (w(p)) over volume of water (v(w)) for the mixtures were 0, 1:40, 2:40, and 3:40. Each mixture also contained 100 g of biomass-fungi material and 40 g of whole wheat flour. The print quality of the samples was evaluated based on the extrudability and shape stability. The results showed that mixtures without any psyllium husk powder were not extrudable. An increase in the ratio of psyllium husk powder to water from 1:40 to 2:40 resulted in improved print quality; however, when the psyllium husk powder to water ratio was increased to 3:40, the extrudability became worse. This phenomenon was explained by analyzing the rheological properties of the mixtures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available