4.6 Article

Rate of Fen-Peat Soil Subsidence Near Drainage Ditches (Central Poland)

Journal

LAND
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/land10121287

Keywords

drained peat soils; ditch subsidence; empirical equations of peat subsidence; drainage ditches

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed a significant decrease in the designed depth of drainage ditches in the drained Solec fen-peat area in central Poland over the past 47 years, with medium degree of peat decomposition and varying subsidence rates in different locations.
This study analyzed design depths (t(o)), post-subsidence depths (t), shallowing magnitudes (d = t(o) - t) and ratio values (d/t) of 12 drainage ditches in a fragment of the drained Solec fen-peat (central Poland) over a period of 47 years between 1967 and 2014. A significant decrease of the designed depth of the ditches t(o) was shown, from the average designed value of 0.97 m to their average depth after subsidence, t = 0.71 m. The ratio (d/t) of 0.41, which is associated with the degree of organic matter decomposition, indicated medium degree of peat decomposition. The average values of bank and bottom subsidence of the ditches during the analyzed period, 1967-2014, were 0.43 m and 0.17 m, respectively. The values of the average annual rate of land surface subsidence in the vicinity of the ditches were varied and within the range of 0.09 cm year(-1) to 1.70 cm year(-1), with an average of 0.92 cm year(-1). Two linear empirical equations were proposed to calculate the amount of subsidence and the average annual rate of subsidence of peat soil surface near the drainage ditch route, based on the knowledge of the initial thickness of the peat deposit. The results of calculations using the equations proposed by the authors were compared with calculations of the same parameters using 10 equations published in the literature. The results obtained using the proposed equations were mostly larger than those calculated with literature-published equations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available