4.6 Article

Deep ocean prokaryotic communities are remarkably malleable when facing long-term starvation

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 713-723

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14002

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. DOREMI - Spanish Government [CTM2012-34294]
  2. HOTMIX - Spanish Government [CTM2011-30010/MAR]
  3. REMEI - Spanish Government [CTM2015-70340-Rf]
  4. SUAVE - Spanish Government [CTM2014-54926-R]
  5. EcoRARE - Spanish Government [CTM2014-60467-JIN]
  6. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The bathypelagic ocean is one of the largest ecosystems on Earth and sustains half of the ocean's microbial activity. This microbial activity strongly relies on surface-derived particles, but there is growing evidence that the carbon released through solubilization of these particles may not be sufficient to meet the energy demands of deep ocean prokaryotes. To explore how bathypelagic prokaryotes respond to the absence of external inputs of carbon, we followed the long-term (1 year) dynamics of an enclosed community. Despite the lack of external energy supply, we observed a continuous succession of active prokaryotic phylotypes, which was driven by recruitment of taxa from the seed bank (i.e., initially rare operational taxonomic units [OTUs]). A single OTU belonging to Marine Group I of Thaumarchaeota, which was originally rare, dominated the microbial community for similar to 4 months and played a fundamental role in this succession likely by introducing new organic carbon through chemolithoautotrophy. This carbon presumably produced a priming effect, because after the decline of Thaumarchaeota, the diversity and metabolic potential of the community increased back to the levels present at the start of the experiment. Our study demonstrates the profound versatility of deep microbial communities when facing organic carbon deprivation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available