4.6 Article

NiOx/MoOx bilayer as an efficient hole-selective contact in crystalline silicon solar cells

Journal

CELL REPORTS PHYSICAL SCIENCE
Volume 2, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100684

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61622407]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [19ZR1479100, 20520760700]
  3. ShanXi Science and Technology Department [20201101012]
  4. DNL Cooperation Fund, CAS [DNL202015]
  5. Analytical Instrumentation Center, School of Physical Science and Technology, Shanghai Tech University [SPST-AIC10112914]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research team introduced a NiOx/MoOx bilayer as an efficient hole-selective contact and achieved high power conversion efficiency. Depositing NiOx on MoOx, interfacial reactions modified the chemistry of both oxides, leading to enhanced hole selectivity.
Designing effective carrier-selective contact is a prerequisite for high-efficiency crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar cells. Compared to doped silicon thin films, wide-band-gap transition metal oxides (TMOs) feature low parasitic absorption, but their carrier selectivity and passivation being poor leads to a mediocre cell efficiency. Herein, we introduce a NiOx/MoOx bilayer as an efficient hole-selective contact in c-Si solar cells. A power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 21.31% is achieved using NiOx/MoOx. bilayer, outperforming cells with a single layer of NiOx or MoOx Upon depositing NiOx on MoOx, interfacial reactions modify the stoichiometry and defect chemistry in both oxides, leading to a band alignment beneficial for hole selectivity. By inserting a SiOx tunneling layer on c-Si surface to further suppress recombination, we achieve a PCE of 21.60% (fill factor 83.34%). Our work highlights a promising approach to improve the performance of dopant-free c-Si solar cells by employing cost-effective TMOs as hole-selective contact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available