4.5 Article

Guided Self-Assembly of ES-Derived Lung Progenitors into Biomimetic Tube Structures That Impact Cell Differentiation

Journal

BIOENGINEERING-BASEL
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering8120209

Keywords

pluripotent stem cells; lung progenitor cells; geometric confinement; mechanical cue; biomaterial; extracellular matrix; directed differentiation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that culturing progenitor cells in tube structures can influence cellular morphology and differentiation status, with sensitivity to tube diameter but not seeding density. These findings suggest that geometric cues play a role in homogenizing cellular morphology and influencing fate status.
Chemically directed differentiation of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) into defined cell types is a potent strategy for creating regenerative tissue models and cell therapies. In vitro observations suggest that physical cues can augment directed differentiation. We recently demonstrated that confining human PSC-derived lung progenitor cells in a tube with a diameter that mimics those observed during lung development results in the alteration of cell differentiation towards SOX2(-)SOX9(+) lung cells. Here we set out to assess the robustness of this geometric confinement effect with respect to different culture parameters in order to explore the corresponding changes in cell morphometry and determine the feasibility of using such an approach to enhance directed differentiation protocols. Culture of progenitor cells in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) tubes reliably induced self-organization into tube structures and was insensitive to a variety of extracellular matrix coatings. Cellular morphology and differentiation status were found to be sensitive to the diameter of tube cells that were cultured within but not to seeding density. These data suggest that geometric cues impose constraints on cells, homogenize cellular morphology, and influence fate status.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available