4.1 Review

A Review of Aging and the Lower Urinary Tract: The Future of Urology

Journal

INTERNATIONAL NEUROUROLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 273-284

Publisher

KOREAN CONTINENCE SOC
DOI: 10.5213/inj.2142042.021

Keywords

Lower urinary tract symptoms; Treatment; Aging; Multidisciplinary

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As the elderly population with multiple comorbidities is increasing, the burden of LUTS will increase. Factors such as frailty and dementia should not be overlooked in the evaluation of elderly patients. Active case identification and multidisciplinary collaboration are recommended for better treatment and management.
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are common among elderly people, with significant effects on individuals, caregivers, and the wider health care system. As the elderly population with multiple comorbidities is increasing, the burden of LUTS will increase. This review describes the demographic trends in the aging society, changes in lower urinary tract function with aging, and deterioration of physical and cognitive function in aging, as well as what has been done regarding geriatric urology and what urologists should do to meet the health care needs of the aging population. Frailty and dementia are unmissable factors in the evaluation of elderly patients. Numerous reports have described associations between LUTS and frailty and between LUTS and dementia. Urologists must be aware of the multiplex physical, cognitive, and social characteristics of elderly people. Maintaining a geriatric viewpoint in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of elderly individuals with LUTS will fulfill the unmet needs of elderly people. It is also essential to discuss the treatment and management goals of LUTS with patients and caregivers. Active case identification, appropriate evaluations of LUTS and comorbidities, and a multidisciplinary approach with other health-care professionals are recommended for better treatment and management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available