4.3 Review

Metabolite Identification in the Preclinical and Clinical Phase of Drug Development

Journal

CURRENT DRUG METABOLISM
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages 838-857

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1389200222666211006104502

Keywords

Metabolite identification; drug toxicity; drug exposure; covalent-binding drug; drug safety; natural medicines

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81903701, 81521005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identification of metabolites plays a crucial role in drug development by influencing drug behavior and safety assessment, requiring appropriate methods and strategies for comprehensive identification.
Metabolite identification plays a critical role in the phases during drug development. Drug metabolites can contribute to efficacy, toxicity, and drug-drug interaction. Thus, the correct identification of metabolites is essential to understand the behavior of drugs in humans. Drug administration authorities (e.g., FDA, EMA, and NMPA) emphasize evaluating the safety of human metabolites with exposure higher than 10% of the total drugrelated components. Many previous reviews have summarized the various methods, tools, and strategies for the appropriate and comprehensive identification of metabolites. In this review, we focus on summarizing the importance of identifying metabolites in the preclinical and clinical phases of drug development. Summarized scenarios include the role of metabolites in pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) analysis, disproportional exposure of metabolites that contribute to drug toxicity, changes in metabolite exposure in renal-impaired patients, covalent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (anticancer drugs), and metabolite identification of drug candidates from natural medicines. This review is aimed to provide meaningful insight into the significant role of metabolite identification in drug development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available