4.1 Article

Effects of a rooftop wind turbine on the dispersion of air pollutant behind a cube-shaped building

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.taml.2021.100296

Keywords

Urban wind power; Actuator disk model; Wind-turbine wake; Pollutant dispersion

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [11772128, 11772266]
  2. State Key Laboratory for Alternative Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources [LAPS202107]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rooftop wind turbines can reduce pollutant mass fraction near the ground and pedestrian level by changing flow patterns and suppressing pollutant dispersion behind buildings. The wake effect weakens turbulent fluctuations and spanwise dispersion, while also enhancing vertical pollutant dispersion by weakening downwash movement of buildings.
The concentration distribution of urban air pollutants is closely related to people's health. As an important utilization form of urban wind power, rooftop wind turbines have been widely used in cities. The wake effect of the rooftop wind turbines will change the flow behind buildings and then affect the pollutant dispersion. To this end, the pollutant dispersion behind the building is studied via the computational fluid dynamics method. The actuator disk model and idealized cube are adopted to model the wind turbine and the building, respectively. The study shows that the rooftop wind turbine can reduce the pollutant mass fraction near the ground and the pedestrian level. Due to the wake effect of the rooftop wind turbine, the turbulent fluctuation behind the building is weakened, and the spanwise pollutant dispersion is suppressed. Besides, the rooftop wind turbine weakens the downwash movement of the building, which enhances the vertical pollutant dispersion. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available