4.7 Article

Computational methods for protein localization prediction

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages 5834-5844

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.10.023

Keywords

Protein localization prediction; Computational methods; Review

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [R35-GM126985, R21-LM012790]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate annotation of protein localization plays a crucial role in understanding protein function. Computational prediction, especially with recent advancements in machine learning, has been a key research area for over two decades. This review paper categorizes main features and algorithms, summarizes existing prediction tools, evaluates their performance, and provides future outlook for protein localization methods.
The accurate annotation of protein localization is crucial in understanding protein function in tandem with a broad range of applications such as pathological analysis and drug design. Since most proteins do not have experimentally-determined localization information, the computational prediction of protein localization has been an active research area for more than two decades. In particular, recent machinelearning advancements have fueled the development of new methods in protein localization prediction. In this review paper, we first categorize the main features and algorithms used for protein localization prediction. Then, we summarize a list of protein localization prediction tools in terms of their coverage, characteristics, and accessibility to help users find suitable tools based on their needs. Next, we evaluate some of these tools on a benchmark dataset. Finally, we provide an outlook on the future exploration of protein localization methods. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available