3.8 Article

Scale for assessing the quality of life of women with Human Papillomavirus infection

Journal

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

ASSOC BRASILEIRA ENFERMAGEM
DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0698

Keywords

Papillomavirus Infections; Quality of Life; Psychometrics; Validation Study; Women's Health

Categories

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [134402/2014-6]
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) [88882.328329/2019-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study successfully developed and validated a scale for assessing the quality of life of women with Human Papillomavirus infection, with a total of 54 items allocated in 6 domains. Through various stages of validation and testing, it was demonstrated that the instrument is valid and reliable for assessing the quality of life of women with HPV infection.
Objectives: to develop and validate a scale for assessing the quality of life of women with Human Papillomavirus infection. Methods: a methodological study to develop the stages of item elaboration, apparent and content validation, semantic validation, pre-test, item allocation in domains, and reliability. Results: 98 items were elaborated and submitted to apparent and content validation (version 2; n=05). In semantic validation, 90.9% of women considered all items clear and understandable (version 3; n=11). In pre-test, the best applicability was in the form of a self-administered questionnaire in relation to the interview (version 4; n=38). The Exploratory Factor Analysis allocated 58 items in 6 domains; (version 5; n=351). For reliability, the general Cronbach's alpha value was 0.883. Conclusions: the instrument proved to be valid and reliable for assessing the quality of life of women with Human infection, of 54 items allocated in 6 domains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available