4.5 Review

Unfolded protein response activated by endoplasmic reticulum stress in pancreatic cancer: potential therapeutical target

Journal

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages 1689-1696

Publisher

IMR PRESS
DOI: 10.52586/5061]

Keywords

Endoplasmic reticulum stress; Unfolded pro-tein response; Pancreatic cancer; Apoptosis

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81871954, 81672353]
  2. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [7212111]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pancreatic cancer remains a highly dangerous malignant tumor with a poor prognosis, and the efficacy of traditional therapies is limited. Recent studies have highlighted the important roles of autophagy and apoptosis triggered by endoplasmic reticulum stress in the tumorigenesis of pancreatic cancer.
Pancreatic cancer is still one of the most perilous malignant tumors with a very poor prognosis. Despite the progress in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic can-cer, the overall 5-year survival rate after diagnosis is less than 10%. The pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer has not been fully clarified, but multiple factors are involved. The poor efficacy of traditional therapies for pancreatic cancer is mainly related to complex tumor microenvironment. In recent years, accumulating studies have demonstrated the role of autophagy and apoptosis triggered by endoplasmic reticulum stress in pancreatic cancer. In particular, un-folded protein response is activated by endoplasmic retic-ulum stress and plays an important role in the modula-tion of complex pancreatic tumor microenvironment. Here we summarize recent progress in our understanding of the role of unfolded protein response activated by endoplasmic reticulum stress in tumorigenesis of pancreatic cancer, and highlight the potential of the cascade of unfolded protein response as therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available