3.8 Article

Investigating changes in groundwater level in Kashan plain

Journal

INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF HEALTH SCIENCES
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 249-252

Publisher

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/iahs.iahs_2_21

Keywords

Fall; groundwater; water consumption; water harvesting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the groundwater level in Kashan plain has been decreasing over the past 28 years, with an average annual drop of 0.54 meters, mainly due to uncontrolled harvesting. Management strategies need to be implemented to ensure sustainable use of water resources in the area.
Aims: Management of water resources, especially groundwater in arid and semiarid regions, is of particular importance. Various natural and human factors in recent decades have created critical conditions for these resources. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate changes in groundwater levels over the past 28 years. Materials and Methods: To conduct this research, statistics related to 64 piezometer wells were studied during the years 1990-2018, and the effect of rainfall and extraction from groundwater resources was interpreted and analyzed. Results: The results of the study showed that according to the hydrograph of 64 piezometer wells in Kashan plain, the groundwater level has a downward trend and has decreased by 15.29 m during 28 years. The annual drop was 0.54 m. An increasing peak of water table was also observed. Moreover, the water level has decreased slightly in some years and has not decreased in some years. Conclusion: The study shows that uncontrolled harvesting in the long run has had a more significant impact than rainfall on groundwater resources. Moreover, water abstraction has occurred on average in the southern and southeastern parts of the plain, which can be due to the concentration of agricultural lands in this area. To reduce this trend, strong management strategies should be adopted and appropriate to the situation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available