3.8 Proceedings Paper

GMOT-40: A Benchmark for Generic Multiple Object Tracking

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00665

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation [1814745, 2006665]
  2. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1814745] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [2006665] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces contributions to the study of Generic Multiple Object Tracking (GMOT), including the construction of the GMOT-40 dataset, design of baseline algorithms, and evaluations. GMOT is expected to receive more attention in future research.
Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) has witnessed remarkable advances in recent years. However, existing studies dominantly request prior knowledge of the tracking target (eg, pedestrians), and hence may not generalize well to unseen categories. In contrast, Generic Multiple Object Tracking (GMOT), which requires little prior information about the target, is largely under-explored. In this paper, we make contributions to boost the study of GMOT in three aspects. First, we construct the first publicly available dense GMOT dataset, dubbed GMOT-40, which contains 40 carefully annotated sequences evenly distributed among 10 object categories. In addition, two tracking protocols are adopted to evaluate different characteristics of tracking algorithms. Second, by noting the lack of devoted tracking algorithms, we have designed a series of baseline GMOT algorithms. Third, we perform a thorough evaluations on GMOT-40, involving popular MOT algorithms (with necessary modifications) and the proposed baselines. The GMOT-40 benchmark is publicly available at https://github.com/Spritea/GMOT40.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available