3.8 Article

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy distribution in older people: A cautionary note

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12145

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid PET; cerebral amyloid angiopathy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The neuropathological examination of 65 older individuals revealed that cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) can be abundant in non-Alzheimer's dementia (non-AD dementia) and control brains, with a significant correlation between vessel A beta 40 density and vessel A beta 42 density noted across all subjects. This suggests caution is needed when interpreting amyloid PET imaging results.
Introduction Radiolabeled ligands for fibrillar amyloid beta (A beta) peptides are used in positron emission tomography (PET) for dementia diagnosis. Current ligands do not discriminate parenchymal amyloid plaques from cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Methods We undertook neuropathological examination of 65 older people (81.6 +/- 7.96 (mean +/- SD) years, 27F/38M): 15 with neuropathological diagnosis of AD, 25 with neuropathological diagnosis of other neurodegenerative dementias (Lewy body dementia and Parkinson disease dementia), and 25 without significant neurodegenerative pathology. Results We observed CAA in non-Alzheimer's dementia (non-AD dementia) and control brains, of comparable extent to those with neuropathologically confirmed AD. A beta-positive vessel density did not differ significantly between non-AD dementia and control groups. Across all subjects there was a highly significant correlation between vessel A beta 40 density and vessel A beta 42 density (Spearman rho = 0.855, P < .001). CAA was absent or sparse in subcortical white matter across all patient groups. Conclusion Our data indicate that CAA can be abundant in non-AD brains and raise a cautionary note regarding interpretation of amyloid PET imaging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available