4.7 Article

Artificial neural network prediction of buckling load of thin cylindrical shells under axial compression

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages 843-855

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.016

Keywords

Thin cylindrical shells; Classical buckling theory; Knockdown factors; Artificial neural networks; Bayesian regularisation backpropagation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thin-walled circular cylindrical shells under axial compression are prone to buckling; the reduction of buckling load from the theoretical estimation is considered primarily due to imperfection sensitivity. The buckling load from carefully conducted experiments using nominally similar shells falls below the prediction by the classical theory with substantial scatter. The current design recommendations apply highly conservative knockdown factors to the theoretical buckling loads to estimate the load carrying capacity of the shell structures. In this study, a systematic analysis of experimental data from the literature has been conducted using the artificial neural network (ANN). The networks were trained using Bayesian regularisation backpropagation training function. Two network models with eight and ten neurones were used to train, test and validate 390 sets of experimental data. The buckling loads predicted by the ANN models were compared with the design recommendations by National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Eurocode 3 (EC3) and the experimental buckling loads. The ANN models predict buckling load within 10% of the experimental buckling load and can be reliably used within the parametric range used in training. The NASA design recommendations provides 10-50% conservative estimates compared to the experimental loads while EC3 predictions are conservative by more than 50%. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available