4.3 Article

Self-expanding covered metallic stents as a transition to silicone stent implantation in management of severe post-tuberculosis bronchial stenosis

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/17534666211019564

Keywords

post-tuberculosis bronchial stenosis; self-expanding covered metallic stent; silicone stent; transition

Funding

  1. Collaborative Innovation Research Program of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University [201505-gyfyy]
  2. Foundation for Youth Innovation Talent in Higher Education of Guangdong, China [B195001307]
  3. [2018GZR0201002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of covered self-expanding metallic stents as a transition to silicone stent implantation for treating severe PTBS, finding that this approach could reduce complications and improve success rates. Patients who received transitional SEMSs had smaller luminal caliber and underwent fewer transbronchial dilations before silicone stent implantation.
Background and aims: Post-tuberculosis bronchial stenosis (PTBS) is one of the most common complications of tracheobronchial tuberculosis. Silicone stent serves as a major treatment for maintaining airway patency. However, silicone stent placement remains a large challenge in patients with severe cicatricial PTBS. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of covered, self-expanding, metallic stents (SEMSs) as a transition to silicone stent implantation for treating severe PTBS. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with severe PTBS who received airway stenting in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University between September 2015 and May 2019. The types of the stent, intervention procedures, bronchoscopic findings, clinical outcomes and related complications were collected and analyzed. Results: Fifty-eight cases with severe PTBS were included in this study. Thirteen (22.4%) of the patients received bronchial silicone stent implantation immediately after dilations. For the remaining 45 (77.6%) patients, silicone stents could not be deployed after dilations and SEMSs implantation was implemented as a bridge to silicone stenting. The SEMSs were placed for an interval of 28.4 +/- 11.1 days. All of the silicone stents were inserted successfully following the removal of SEMSs. No SEMS-related complication occurred. The subgroup analysis showed that patients who received transitional SEMSs had less luminal caliber but fewer transbronchial dilations before silicone stent implantation (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Covered SEMS placement as a transition to silicone stenting could serve as a feasible procedure to reduce complications and improve the success rate of silicone stent implantation in patients with severe PTBS. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available