4.7 Article

Modeling the spatial variability of the shear strength of discontinuities of rock masses: Application to a dam rock mass

Journal

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
Volume 220, Issue -, Pages 133-143

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.01.023

Keywords

Rock joints; Gravity-dam; Rock foundation; Shear strength; Spatial variability; Geostatistic

Funding

  1. IRSTEA (France)
  2. University of Sherbrooke (Canada)
  3. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The shear strength of discontinuities plays a key role in the stability of rock masses, particularly in the case of analyzing the sliding stability of the rock foundations of gravity dams. This paper proposes a methodology for analyzing the spatial variability of shear strength along the joints of rock mass, based on the input parameters of the Barton and Choubey's model. The aim of this approach is to evaluate the reduction of the variance of the parameters involved at full-scale by identifying a deterministic trend varying in depth and a spatial correlation calculated from a variographic analysis. An advantage of this methodology is to use a simple experimental protocol (a laser profilometer, a portable shear test apparatus and a concrete sclerometer), which generates large sets of shear strength properties for assessing their spatial variability. The methodology is illustrated in the case of the rock foundation of a concrete gravity dam. Analysis of the spatial variability conducted for this case study led to a significant reduction of the variance of the variable analyzed. The advantage of this method is demonstrated through the evaluation of the probability of failure performed in a study of this structure's stability. Taking variance reduction into account in the case study led to significantly reducing the probability of failure assessed through a reliability analysis. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available