3.8 Review

Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Sub-Saharan Africa

Journal

JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages 756-766

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/GO.20.00425

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. AIDS Malignancy Consortium of the National Cancer Institute, United States

Ask authors/readers for more resources

More than 80% of hepatocellular carcinoma cases occur in sub-Saharan Africa and East Asia, with chronic hepatitis B virus infection being the most common risk factor in SSA. Co-infection of HIV and HBV increases the risk of developing HCC in SSA.
More than 80% of global hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients are estimated to occur in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Eastern Asia. The most common risk factor of HCC in SSA is chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, with the incidence highest in West Africa. HBV is highly endemic in SSA and is perpetuated by incomplete adherence to birth dose immunization, lack of longitudinal follow-up care, and impaired access to antiviral therapy. HBV may directly cause HCC through somatic genetic alterations or indirectly through altered liver function and liver cirrhosis. Other risk factors of HCC in SSA include aflatoxins and, to a lesser extent, African iron overload. HIV plus HBV co-infection increases the risk of developing HCC and is increasingly becoming more common because of improving the survival of patients with HIV infection. Compared with the rest of the world, patients with HCC in SSA have the lowest survival. This is partly due to the late presentation of HCC with advanced symptomatic disease as a result of underdeveloped surveillance practices. Moreover, access to care and resource limitations further limit outcomes for the patients who receive a diagnosis in SSA. There is a need for multipronged strategies to decrease the incidence of HCC and improve its outcomes in SSA. (C) 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available