4.8 Review

Structural Chemistry of Metal-Organic Frameworks under Hydrostatic Pressures

Journal

ACS MATERIALS LETTERS
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages 1635-1651

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00250

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DFG [FOR2433]
  2. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
  3. DFG through a COORNET [SPP1928]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studying the structural behavior of metal-organic frameworks under high pressures is a growing field focusing on identifying principles related to technological properties and material behaviors. Important aspects include rigorous reporting of experimental procedures, opportunities with customized high-pressure diffraction setups, the nature and impact of pressure-transmitting mediums, and strengthening the ties between computation and experimentation.
Studying the structural behavior of metal-organic frameworks ( MOFs) under hydrostatic pressures is a steadily growing area. The goal of active research is identification of overarching composition-structure principles including both properties of technological relevance and material behavior of academic interest such as material stability criteria, mechanical properties, pressure-induced phase transitions, negative compressibilities, and guest-dependent high-pressure structural responses. Here the current literature on the high-pressure structural responses of MOFs is reviewed with focus on bulk moduli, pressure-transmitting medium dependent properties, pressure-induced phase transitions, and amorphization processes-properties that are derived from high-pressure X-ray diffraction studies. After highlighting topical examples, aspects of high-pressure diffraction studies on MOFs are summarized that are important to advance the field such as the rigorous reporting of experimental and analytical procedures, opportunities that come with custom-made high-pressure diffraction setups, the nature and impact of the pressure-transmitting medium, and the role of forging even closer ties between computation and experiment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available