4.7 Article

Energy efficiency and marginal carbon dioxide emission abatement cost in urban China

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 105, Issue -, Pages 246-255

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.039

Keywords

Energy efficiency; Carbon dioxide emission abatement cost; Slacks-based measure; Urban area; China's cities

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71503161]
  2. grants of Humanities and Social Sciences of National Ministry of Education of China [16YJAZH043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Energy efficiency improvement and carbon emission reduction are two important ways to mitigate energy consumptions and global warming. This paper aims to examine energy efficiency and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions abatement costs of city urban areas in China. To this end, an improved slacks-based measure approach is introduced, which considers the linkage between desirable and undesirable outputs. Then, measures of energy efficiency, CO2 emission abatement cost and comprehensive state index of CO2 emissions abatement cost and CO2 emissions reduction potential are defined. The proposed model is then applied to the dataset of 285 cities in China during 2008-2012. The results show that most city urban areas in China have relatively low energy efficiencies. Surprisingly, there are gradually narrowing gaps regarding mean energy efficiencies between areas during 2008-2012. Nevertheless, there are great disparities in energy efficiencies between cities within a typical area, and even a provincial region. It is found that CO2 emissions abatement cost in urban China exhibits an increasing trend during the study period. Also, significantly geographic disparities in abatement costs between areas, regions and cites are found. Specifically, energy efficiency has significantly positive correlation with the comprehensive state index in China. Some important-findings and useful policy implications are achieved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available