4.7 Article

Energy Performance Contract models for the diffusion of green-manufacturing technologies in China: A stakeholder analysis from SMEs' perspective

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 59-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.040

Keywords

Energy performance contracting; Green-manufacturing; Energy-saving technology; Small-and-medium size enterprises; Stakeholder theory; Trade-offs

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91646102, L16240452, L1524015, 71203117]
  2. MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences [16JDGC011]
  3. Volvo Group in a research project of the Research Center for Green Economy and Sustainable Development, Tsinghua University [20153000181]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small-and-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are significant to China's emission reduction programme. This research aims to improve our understanding of the challenge of diffusing green-manufacturing technologies among SMEs in China. Specifically, this study examines the Chinese Government's effort to facilitate reduction of energy consumption among SMEs through Energy Performance Contracts (EPCs) to incentivize domestic manufacturers to adopt energy efficient measures (EEMs) in order to reduce demand for energy and corresponding drop in emissions. The data is gathered from relevant EPC stakeholders in the National Motor Upgrading Demonstration Project and its implementation in Dongguan city, which is based on 30 in-depth interviews and 6 focus group discussions. Using stakeholder analysis, this study finds that guaranteed energy savings model is the favorite model in implementation, given the gained benefits outweigh committed resources, and the control capability overrides possible risks among the two core stakeholders. The outcomes of this study may allow the government to have a clear understanding of stakeholder perception of the different EPC models used in China so the design and deployment of these mechanisms can be improved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available