4.7 Article

Multi-criteria decision analysis of energy system transformation pathways: A case study for Switzerland

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 155-168

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.026

Keywords

Energy policy making; Scenario modelling; Multi criteria decision analysis; Trade-off analysis; Sustainability assessment; Life cycle assessment

Funding

  1. Competence Centre of Environment and Sustainability (CCES)
  2. Competence Centre of Energy and Mobility (CCEM)
  3. Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SFOE)
  4. Alstom Power Service
  5. Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research - Supply of Electricity (SCCER SoE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two recent political decisions are expected to frame the development of the Swiss energy system in the coming decades: the nuclear phase-out and the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction target. To accomplish both of them, low-carbon technologies based on renewable energy and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) are expected to gain importance. The objective of the present work is to support prospective Swiss energy policy-making by providing a detailed sustainability analysis of possible energy system transformation pathways. For this purpose, the results of the scenario quantification with an energy system model are coupled with multi-criteria sustainability analysis. Two climate protection and one reference scenario are addressed, and the trade-offs between the scenarios are analysed based on a set of 12 interdisciplinary indicators. Implementing a stringent climate policy in Switzerland is associated with co-benefits such as less fossil resource use, less fatalities in severe accidents in the energy sector, less societal conflicts and higher resource autonomy. The availability and implementation of CCS allows for achieving the GHG emission reduction target at lower costs, but at the expense of a more fossil fuel-based energy system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available