4.7 Article

An evidence-based approach for investment in rapid-charging infrastructure

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 514-524

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.007

Keywords

Electric vehicles; Business models; Infrastructure; Rapid chargers; Rapid Charge Network

Funding

  1. EU's TEN-T funding programme [2012-EU-13066S]
  2. UK Department for Transport
  3. Nissan
  4. BMW
  5. ESB
  6. Renault
  7. VW
  8. UK's Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/N010612/1]
  9. iBuild [EP/K012398/1]
  10. EPSRC [EP/N010612/1, EP/K012398/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N010612/1, EP/K012398/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To date, real cost data for Electric Vehicle (EV) rapid charging infrastructure is largely missing in the literature, preventing development of economic models to encourage private investment and limiting policy decisions. A business model has been constructed using actual capital expenditure, operating costs and usage data from the Rapid Charge Network project (RCN) which can be used to assist future investment and policy decisions. The model is run under a wide spectrum of EV uptake scenarios to provide plausible answers to a variety of research, policy and investment questions, including minimum growth rates to break even under current policy. Using real-world data we have confirmed that a financial business opportunity does exist for investment in rapid chargers on main highways and have identified the operating area in which a profit can be made. However, since UK EV adoption is still at the Innovators stage in a niche market where innovations in technology, user practices, supporting infrastructure and functionality are still required to achieve wide user acceptance, the case is also made for continued fiscal incentives to encourage investment in rapid -charging infrastructure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available