4.7 Article

Factor substitution and energy productivity fluctuation in China: A parametric decomposition analysis

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 109, Issue -, Pages 181-190

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.003

Keywords

Energy productivity; Rate of change; Substitution effect; Total factor productivity; China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71203151, 71573186, 71603111, 71671080, 71303034]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [NE2017005, KYZZ16-0146]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M611811, 2015M570196, 2016T90166]
  4. Six Talents Peak Project of Jiangsu Province [JY-032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Technical research on energy productivity can support government officials as they evaluate practical energy policies for the future. This study proposed a parametric method to decompose China's energy productivity rate of change into six factors based on a theoretical stochastic frontier analysis. The method was applied to conduct an empirical study using inter-provincial panel data in China from 1995 to 2012. The results highlighted three key points. First, the general rate of change in energy productivity was mainly influenced by a steady positive rate of change in technical progress, combined with a steady negative rate of change in technical efficiency. The core factors causing fluctuations in energy productivity included: a positive rate of change in the substitution of capital and energy, and a negative rate of change in the substitution of labor and energy. Second, from a geographic perspective, provinces with a high rate of change in technical progress experienced a weaker deterioration in technical efficiency. However, the rate of change in technical efficiency tends to decline as the rate of change in technical progress increases. Third, there is a similar changing trend between the substitution of capital and energy and the substitution of labor and energy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available