4.7 Article

Structure characteristics and gasification activity of residual carbon from updraft fixed-bed biomass gasification ash

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages 108-118

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.091

Keywords

Updraft fixed-bed gasifier; Biomass gasification ash; Residual carbon; Structure characteristics; Gasification activity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21506060]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2012AA101810]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The structure characteristics and gasification activity of residual carbon in biomass ash from a 5 MW commercial updraft fixed-bed gasification power plant were investigated using a Raman spectroscopy, a pore structure analyzer and a thermo-gravimetric analyzer. In the investigated biomass gasification ashes, some fractions with a relatively high residual carbon contents could be probably recycled as fuel of gasifier. The crystalline structure of residual carbons in biomass gasification ashes were poorly organized, and the total active sites (sp(2) and mixed sp(2)-sp(3) bond forms) of residual carbons with were ordered as: fly ash > rice straw > bottom ash. The residual carbons in gasification ashes had a higher surface area and a higher gasification activity than those of rice straw. The residual carbons in bottom ashes had a lower surface area, more ordered carbon crystalline structures and less total active sites than those of fly ash. Consequently, the residual carbons in bottom ashes presented a lower gasification activity. The residual carbon which was generally considered as unburnt carbon in gasification ashes were probably originated from partly-gasified carbons and unreacted pyrolytic carbons. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available