4.7 Article

Proposal and thermodynamic analysis of an ejection-compression refrigeration cycle driven by low-grade heat

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 145, Issue -, Pages 343-352

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.05.013

Keywords

Ejection; Compression; Energy-saving; Refrigeration; Low-grade heat; Solar

Funding

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [51376159]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China [LQ17E060001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ejection-compression refrigeration cycle reduces electricity consumption, by using huge quantity of low-grade heat, which increases equipment cost and occupies more space, especially when it is powered by solar heat. Hence, the large solar collector limits the practicability of ejection-compression refrigeration cycle. To solve this problem, a novel ejection-compression refrigeration cycle is proposed in this paper, which needs less heat and a smaller collector. It is theoretically compared to conventional vapor compression refrigeration cycle and conventional ejection-compression refrigeration cycle. It is also analyzed over wide temperature ranges. Results show that the proposed cycle has a COP 24% higher than conventional vapor compression cycle. The proposed cycle also has a COP 19% lower, heat transforming ratio 181% higher, and COPg 144% higher than those of conventional ejection-compression cycle. With a collector 5 times smaller than a conventional ejection-compression cycle, the novel cycle is suitable for city buildings with limited space or economy sensitive users, although its COP is a little lower than conventional ejection-compression cycle. The effects of evaporating, condensing, generating, and intermediate temperatures (T-e, T-c, T-g, and T-m) on cycle performance are explained. At T-m = 10 degrees C, the maximum COP of 4.78 is obtained with the optimized generation temperatures of 72 degrees C. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available