Journal
IWSC'21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 ACM INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON WEARABLE COMPUTERS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 124-128Publisher
ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3460421.3478819
Keywords
audio segmentation; wearable technology; Automated Dietary Monitoring; signal processing
Categories
Funding
- BMBF Eghi project [16SV8526]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper compares three onset detection algorithms for acoustic chewing cycle detection, finding that the beat tracking algorithm performs the best in dietary monitoring. After leave-one-participant-out cross validation, the algorithm achieved 83% F-measure performance.
In this paper we compare three onset detection algorithms for acoustic chewing cycle detection, which is a basic step in eating detection and automated dietary monitoring. We introduce a spectral flux algorithm that uses the spectrogram of a chewing sequence to compute a novelty function. Furthermore, beat tracking, in particular the notion of a predominant local pulse is introduced. We compare the two algorithms to a baseline energy-based segmentation in a chewing dataset with seven participants consuming pieces of six different foods, including in total 9818 annotated chewing cycles. Best performance was achieved for the beat tracking algorithm with 83% F-measure after leave-one-participant-out cross validation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available