4.7 Review

Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 140, Issue -, Pages 68-80

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.075

Keywords

Embodied carbon dioxide equivalent; Construction sector; Greenhouse gas emissions; Industry practice

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N509024/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/N509024/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lowering the embodied carbon dioxide equivalent (embodied CO(2)e) of buildings is an essential response to national and global targets for carbon reduction. Globally, construction industry is developing tools, databases and practices for measuring embodied CO(2)e in buildings and recommending routes to reduction. While the TC350 developed standardized methods for the assessment of sustainability aspects in construction works and Environmental Product Declarations, there is no consensus on how this should be carried out in practice.This paper evaluates the current construction industry practice through a review of both academic arid professional literature, and through focus groups and interviews with industry experts in the field. Incentives in the available building codes, standards, and benchmarks are also analysed, as are the existing methodologies, tools and datasets. The multiple data sources are used to identify the barriers to the effective measurement and reduction of embodied CO(2)e in practice. This paper recommends that Governments mandate for improved data quality and support the development of a transparent and simplified methodology. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available