4.7 Article

Annex 51: Case studies and guidelines for energy efficient communities

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 154, Issue -, Pages 529-537

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.074

Keywords

Energy efficient communities; Local energy planning; Energy master plan; Energy system performance; Building energy retrofit; Energy modelling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While IEA EBC Annexes usually are focused on R&D about single energy technologies, their broad scale use in practice is of even higher importance to contribute to global energy goals. This practical application of low-carbon technologies on community scale has been the subject of Annex 51, carried out from 2010 to 2013. In this Annex, evaluating 25 community energy case studies of the 10 participating countries, a 'Guidebook on Successful Urban Energy Planning' has been extracted from these evaluations to directly address practical urban/energy planners and municipal decision makers. The main content of the Guidebook with respect to planning approaches is summarized in this paper, distinguishing between the different planning fields of 'urban energy planning', which is addressing whole cities and communities, and 'local energy planning', oriented to neighbourhoods or building clusters. The necessary link between both is emphasized, considering a city as an interconnected energy system requiring a holistic approach rather than a compartmented consideration. As a side effect, a general method to calculate the primary energy performance of buildings and neighbourhoods employing different energy systems, including energy efficiency or energy conservation technologies, was derived. Using appropriate system characteristics, such as seasonal performances, this approach can be applied for every energy system, and for every building or neighbourhood. It is presented in this paper supplying an example from one of the case studies. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available