4.0 Article

Comparison of Afirma GEC and GSC to Nodules Without Molecular Testing in Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ENDOCRINE SOCIETY
Volume 5, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvab148

Keywords

thyroid nodule; Bethesda III; Bethesda IV; indeterminate thyroid FNA cytopathology; Afirma Gene Expression Classifier; GEC; Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier; GSC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study retrospectively analyzed cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules and found that the implementation of the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) did not affect surgical or malignancy rates, while the Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) resulted in significantly lower surgical rates and higher malignancy rates. Factors associated with the decision to undergo molecular testing were identified, providing insights into the real-world use of molecular markers in indeterminate thyroid nodules.
Background: Analysis of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules with Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) and Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) can reduce surgical rate and increase malignancy rate of surgically resected indeterminate nodules. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of all adults with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules from January 2013 through December 2019. We compared surgical and malignancy rates of those without molecular testing to those with GEC or GSC, analyzed test performance between GEC and GSC, and identified variables associated with molecular testing. Results: 468 indeterminate thyroid nodules were included. No molecular testing was performed in 273, 71 had GEC, and 124 had GSC testing. Surgical rate was 68% in the group without molecular testing, 59% in GEC, and 40% in GSC. Malignancy rate was 20% with no molecular testing, 22% in GEC, and 39% in GSC (P = 0.022). GEC benign call rate (BCR) was 46%; sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 61%; and positive predictive value (PPV), 28%. GSC BCR was 60%; sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 76%; and PPV, 41%. Those with no molecular testing had larger nodule size, preoperative growth of nodules, and constrictive symptoms and those who underwent surgery in the no molecular testing group had higher body mass index, constrictive symptoms, higher Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and Bethesda classifications.Type of provider was also associated with the decision to undergo surgery. Conclusion: Implementation of GEC showed no effect on surgical or malignancy rate, but GSC resulted in significantly lower surgical and higher malignancy rates. This study provides insight into the factors that affect the real-world use of these molecular markers preoperatively in indeterminate thyroid nodules.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available