4.7 Article

The diversity of residential electricity demand - A comparative analysis of metered and simulated data

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages 121-131

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.06.006

Keywords

Domestic electricity use; Energy demand modelling; Electricity demand load profiles

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT)
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/M024652/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/M024652/1, EP/R014965/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M024652/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparative study between simulated residential electricity demand data and metered data from the UK Household Electricity Survey is presented. For this study, a high-resolution probabilistic model was used to test whether this increasingly widely used modelling approach provides an adequate representation of the statistical characteristics the most comprehensive dataset of metered electricity demand available in the UK. Both the empirical and simulated electricity consumption data have been analysed on an aggregated level, paying special attention to the mean daily load profiles, the distribution of households with respect to the total annual demands, and the distributions of the annual demands of particular appliances. A thorough comparison making use of both qualitative and quantitative methods was made between simulated datasets and it's metered counterparts. Significant discrepancies were found in the distribution of households with respect to both overall electricity consumption and consumption of individual appliances. Parametric estimates of the distributions of metered data were obtained, and the analytic expressions for both the density function and cumulative distribution are given. These can be incorporated into new and existent modelling frameworks, as well as used as tools for further analysis. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available