3.8 Proceedings Paper

Leveraging Student-Generated Ideas (SGI) to Facilitate Socio-constructivist Learning and Conceptual Change: The Roles of Technology in SGI Learning Trajectories

Publisher

ASIA PACIFIC SOC COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION

Keywords

Student-generated ideas; socio-constructivism; technology-enhanced learning; seamless learning; knowledge building; guided student questioning; student-generated questions; ubiquitous learning log; productive failure-based flipped classrooms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This panel aims to discuss various technology-enhanced socio-constructivist learning approaches that prioritize Student-Generated Ideas (SGI) in the learning process. While these approaches may have different theoretical foundations and socio-cognitive mechanisms, they share the common goal of promoting student learning and enhancing their thinking abilities.
This panel aims to facilitate an exchange between scholars specialized in various technology-enhanced socio-constructivist learning approaches with the common ground of placing Student-Generated Ideas (SGI) in the center of the learning trajectory. Despite varying theoretical underpinning and socio-cognitive mechanisms, these learning approaches similarly elicit ideas contributed by individual or groups of students in diverse forms and put them into the learners' classroom or online community space to advance their learning. Examples of such approaches are not restricted to those which will be explicated by the panelists, namely, seamless learning, knowledge building, guided student questioning, student-generated questions, ubiquitous learning log, and productive failure-based flipped classrooms, but may also encompass problem-based learning, project-based learning, computational thinking, STEM, design thinking, makers, etc. The roles of technology in facilitating and enhancing such learning trajectories will be discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available